In legal philosophy, fidelity to law is central to the rule of law and judicial restraint. It requires interpreters of the law (especially judges) to respect the original meaning, text, and structure of legal rules, even when they disagree with the outcome. This concept contrasts with approaches that prioritize justice, policy goals, or subjective values over written law.

Definition and meaning

is a fundamental concept in legal philosophy and the rule of law that describes the duty, commitment, and moral obligation of individuals, judges, and government officials to respect, obey, and uphold valid legal rules.

: Legal philosopher Lon Fuller famously argued that for law to command "fidelity," it must meet certain procedural standards (like being public, clear, and consistent). If a legal system is arbitrary or secretive, it loses its claim to our fidelity.

In crises (pandemics, terrorism, war), governments often bypass normal legal procedures. While necessity may compel this, repeated emergencies can destroy the habit of fidelity. As Justice Robert Jackson warned, the Constitution is not a "suicide pact," but neither is it a blank check.

In short: means putting the law above self, politics, or personal morality when acting in a legal or official capacity.