Furthermore, a new errata has been proposed for 2026: . With the rise of AI-generated mola patterns, any mola that perfectly matches a known, downloadable vector design with zero error is now considered a "fake errata." In a strange twist, the complete absence of human error on the Errata List now signifies a machine-made forgery.
The identifies three primary categories of error: fin morphology, mouth position, and body scaling. Mola Errata List
No single official "Mola Errata List" is published by the Guna General Congress. Instead, savvy collectors maintain their own. To start yours: Furthermore, a new errata has been proposed for 2026:
In the world of textile collecting, perfection is often the enemy of authenticity. Nowhere is this truer than with the mola —the vibrant, reverse-appliqued panels handcrafted by the Guna (formerly Kuna) women of the San Blas Islands off the coast of Panama. For decades, collectors have sought museum-quality pieces with impossibly fine stitching. However, a quiet but crucial document exists within serious collecting circles: the . No single official "Mola Errata List" is published